The ten year benchmark bond yield ended the month at 6.60% compared to 6.51% in the beginning
of the month as market awaited directions from the Union budget and RBI monetary policy.
The budget came under obviously difficult circumstances given the need to generate a net positive
fiscal impulse in view of weaker economic growth, while honoring the need for some fiscal discipline
against an adverse revenue picture. Measured against this ask, the finance minister has broadly
delivered. The fiscal deficit numbers for the current year and next are in line with market expectations
at 3.8% and 3.5% of GDP respectively. Gross market borrowing for next year at INR 7,81,000 crores
is similarly in the ball-park expectation range, while no extra borrowing for the current year is an
unequivocal positive surprise for the market. A greater reliance on capital receipts, if fructified, will
ensure that the fiscal impulse stays positive even as there is a 0.3% net consolidation in deficit into
FY21.
The finance minister has also furthered the opening up of our local bond market to off-shore
investors - participating limit for foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) in corporate bonds hiked from
9% of outstanding currently to 15%. Also importantly, certain specified categories of government
securities would be opened fully for non-resident investors, apart from being available to domestic
investors as well. It may be argued that overall interest in Indian bonds is anyway muted for now
and hence these expansions may amount to little in the near term. The other view to take could
be that incremental ease of operation does bring in more flow (all other things being equal) and
that especially the measure on government bonds could be in the direction of ultimate inclusion in
global bond indices.
We had noted our surprise over the December 2019 monetary policy, on not so much the status quo
but the possible underplaying of the continued space for countercyclical role for monetary policy
in the near term. We had found the larger than anticipated focus on supply side inflation in the face
of a 3 - 4% fall in nominal GDP for the year somewhat difficult to square with. We had, however,
found some resolution when the RBI subsequently unveiled "Operation Twist" to help accelerate
transmission even as near term projected CPI was threatening to cross 7%. The February 2020
policy has offered further the evidence that the RBI is indeed following a practitioner's approach
to policy and that while the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) may not have room currently to cut
rates on the back of higher near term CPI, the RBI has other tools in its tool-kit to continue with its
countercyclical responses.
First from a MPC standpoint, the status quo delivered on policy rates was fully expected and par
for the course. Given the uncertainties with respect to near term inflation trajectory, any prudent
committee will await further information. This is especially true since, as noted in the policy document,
there are pressures beyond only in vegetables (milk and pulses for instance) in the current trajectory
of prices. To its credit, however, the MPC hasn't muddled communication and has clearly recognized
space to act in the future. Implicit here seems to be a greater recognition of the growth-inflation
trade-off for now rather than a point focus on 4% CPI at all points in time. Thus, the MPC has kept
the accommodative stance and guidance for future easing alive on the back of an assessment that
CPI slides to 3.2% by Q3 FY 21, even as the average CPI for FY 20 breaches 4% comfortably and so
does the average forecast for the next 3 quarters.
The bigger points in the policy concern the liquidity operations of the central bank. The daily
fixed rate repo and four 14-day term repos every fortnight being conducted, at present, are being
withdrawn. From the fortnight beginning on February 15, 2020, the RBI shall conduct term repos
of one-year and three-year tenors of appropriate sizes for up to a total amount of INR 1,00,000
crore at the policy repo rate. This should encourage banks to undertake maturity transformation
smoothly and seamlessly so as to augment credit flows to productive sectors, as per the central
bank. Additionally, the scheduled commercial banks will be allowed to deduct the equivalent of
incremental credit disbursed by them as retail loans for automobiles, residential housing and loans
to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), over and above the outstanding level of credit to
these segments as at the end of the fortnight ended January 31, 2020 from their net demand and
time liabilities (NDTL) for maintenance of cash reserve ratio (CRR). This exemption will be available
for incremental credit extended up to the fortnight ending July 31, 2020.
Going Forward
Our continued assessment over the past few months has been that there possibly has been a general
under-appreciation of the gravity of our current slowdown (
https://www.idfcmf.com/article/996).
We have therefore had great sympathy for continued counter-cyclical responses even as the need
for more urgency on structural reforms cannot be underplayed. Our only point has been that there
needs to be adequate appreciation of where the maximum depth available is for countercyclical
response. We have also been cognizant of the moral hazard issue when exploring the avenues
for non-traditional responses. For that reason, while we have been happy to support a twist or
outright open market purchases of bonds, we have baulked at endorsing a 'bail-out' package
for stressed balance-sheets. The February policy has been quite consistent with the underlying
macro-environment. This is especially also given the new threat to global growth in the form of the
Coronavirus as well as the obvious limits to fiscal policy that have been clearly evident in the just
announced Union Budget.
From a strategy standpoint, the value in quality front end bonds (up to 5 years) stands reaffirmed
after the long term repo announcements. These repos will enable participants to lock in the current
cost of money for longer and then deploy as per risk appetite. At the very least, it should enable
greater appetite for front end sovereign bonds. Importantly, the RBI Deputy Governor has kept
these operations distinct from durable liquidity operations like open market purchase of bonds
and has clarified that the intent behind twist operations has been to strengthen transmission into
corporate bond yields. Sporadic twist operations are thus quite likely in the future, although the
urgency may not be as great immediately given new tools for transmission that have been unveiled
in the policy (long term repo and selective CRR dispensation).
In our actively managed bond and gilt funds, we have been heavily overweight 'high beta' 13
year government bonds till after the budget, basis our view that the market was perhaps overfearing
the event. Since the budget we have shifted these portfolios more in favor of 8 - 10 year
government bonds on the higher absolute value offered in this segment and since the "momentum"
trade generated post budget may have soon dissipated. We find this positioning conducive to the
monetary policy announcements. Government bonds up to 5 years or so may find even greater
support in context of the long term repo operations. For 'real money' that wants somewhat higher
duration given an otherwise conducive rate environment, the 5 - 10 year part of the curve may thus
offer reasonable value. As always, this strategy represents our current thoughts and is subject to
change at short notice in light of market dynamics and our own evolving assessment.